Liverpool’s ownership saga has taken a curious turn with claims from Errol Musk that his billionaire son, Elon Musk, would like to buy the club. Errol told reporters, “He would like to yes, obviously. Anybody would want to, so would I.” Yet there’s a difference between interest and reality, and Fenway Sports Group (FSG) has made it clear that the club isn’t on the market.
That position hasn’t changed since John Henry, Liverpool’s principal owner, reaffirmed, “Will we be in England forever? No. Are we selling LFC? Have we sold anything in the past 20+ years?” Mike Gordon, president of FSG, added, “FSG’s long-term commitment to Liverpool remains as strong as ever.” They’ve also recently sold a minority stake to Dynasty Equity, signaling a plan to secure the club’s future without relinquishing overall control.
Reports suggest the cost to buy Liverpool could exceed $10 billion, which wouldn’t necessarily scare off Elon Musk, whose net worth is well above that. His father hinted that a formal bid would raise Liverpool’s price further, saying, “I can’t comment on that. They’ll raise the price.” Still, observers doubt whether FSG has any intention of letting go.
How Liverpool’s community is pushing back against a billionaire takeover rumor
Many Liverpool supporters don’t want Musk anywhere near the Kop. Social media voices have been harsh, with fans questioning whether Musk appreciates Anfield‘s traditions, social values, and community spirit. Some worry the spotlight draws him more than the club’s essence. They recall his fleeting tweet about buying Manchester United—later dismissed as a joke—and see it as proof that he might not be serious about football.
Financial analysts have also chimed in. Dr. Rob Wilson notes, “Given the profile of the team, especially with its current EPL form, it’s unlikely that they’d want to hand over full control.” There’s concern that Musk’s style, often described as “move-fast-and-break-things,” wouldn’t translate well in a league bound by spending and ownership conduct regulations. Dr. Jones echoed that skepticism, saying, “Musk is a move-fast-and-break-things disrupter but he wouldn’t be able to make an immediate impact on Liverpool as he’d like.”
Local sentiment is another major hurdle. Liverpool is known for its strong cultural identity, and fans have seen enough owners come and go to know that deep pockets alone don’t guarantee success. Many supporters fear that a high-profile billionaire owner might overshadow the club’s values and bring more chaos than trophies. They point out that football is not just big business but a cherished inheritance for them.
FSG, for their part, insists they’re not hunting for suitors, even if they’re open to strategic investments. It’s a stance that seems rooted in realism. Liverpool’s current stability, both on the pitch and in finances, is something they’re keen to preserve. Any major shift could disrupt that balance.
Elon Musk remains a source of chatter rather than a serious bidder. The American ownership at Liverpool might change one day, but as things stand, the door to Anfield isn’t open. And if fan reactions are any indication, the welcome mat is nowhere in sight.
